Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Business Alliance for Local Living Economies
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. North America1000 22:50, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- Business Alliance for Local Living Economies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is a press release with no reliable sources to demonstrate notability of the subject. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:08, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 18:53, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 18:56, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: See the organisation's own text marked as copyright here. I've tagged CSD G12. AllyD (talk) 06:47, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: There is a non-copyvio version of the article in the history, so I'm going to revert to that. There's a mild assertion of notability here, so I'd like for this to go through a full AfD. If it's deemed non-notable then this would prevent it from being re-created in the future. Since the promotional/copyvio material was added by a clear COI editor, it looks like it's possible that it would be re-added otherwise. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:55, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete failure to meet WP:GNG. @Tokyogirl79:
Would this be eligible for Speedy Deletion per WP:A7 in its current form?—Godsy(TALKCONT) 05:32, 11 August 2015 (UTC)- "There's a mild assertion of notability here, so I'd like for this to go through a full AfD." Should have read your full comment, just noticed your name in the discussion, and decided to ping. My apologies,—Godsy(TALKCONT) 05:34, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete for now - It's worth noting this has actually stayed since October 2007 with no significant improvement and more of removing content actually and my searches found nothing particularly good here, here, here and here. SwisterTwister talk 05:24, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. Onel5969 TT me 12:54, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.